 |
|
 |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Africa Policy E-Journal
Africa: Sign-On Letter to G7 Africa Policy Electronic Distribution List: an information service provided by AFRICA ACTION (incorporating the Africa Policy Information Center, The Africa Fund, and the American Committee on Africa). Find more information for action for Africa at http://www.africaaction.org +++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++
Region: Continent-Wide SUMMARY CONTENTS: This posting contains a sign-on letter on Africa policy to be sent to G7 finance ministers. The letter is initiated by ActionAid USA, Africa Action, the 50 Years Is Enough Network; and TransAfrica Forum. As indicated below, organizational sign-ons from groups, including the country where they are based, should be sent to the 50 Years is Enough Network at g7africa@yahoo.com, by 5 pm U.S. east coast time on Wednesday, June 12. (June 14: A list of signatories received before the deadline is included below at the end of the letter). [The G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and USA. When joined by Russia (for some meetings), they are called the G8. The European Union also participates in the summits.] The sign-on letter is preceded by a brief update on recent U.S. congressional action on funding for HIV/AIDS, one of the issues that should be high on the agenda of the G-7 leaders. It is followed by selected links to more information on the forthcoming G-7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada and related protest actions. A related posting sent out today contains excerpts from a critique from the South African Council of Churches and the South African Catholic Bishops Conference of the current content of the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD), which features prominently on the Kananaskis agenda. +++++++++++++++++end profile++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Africa Action Update
Under strong pressure from the Bush White House, the U.S. Senate
voted on June 6 by a narrow margin of 49 to 46 to turn down the
Durbin/Specter amendment, a bipartisan proposal to raise
additional funding for global action against AIDS to $500 million
this fiscal year, to be channeled through the Global Fund for
HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and bilaterally. An alternate
proposal from Republican Senators Frist and Helms for $100 million
for bilateral funding for programs to block The Bush administration is reportedly preparing a proposal of its own for additional funding for HIV/AIDS in future years. Advance news stories say the proposal will probably focus on bilateral funding for prevention of mother-to-child-transmission.
Of the $10 billion a year required for the Global Fund, only $725
million has been raised for this year, its first year of operation.
G7 countries as a group have pledged approximately 8 percent of
what they should pay, while the U.S. has pledged approximately 7
percent. See:
ORGANIZATIONAL SIGN ON TO G7 FINANCE MINISTERS - AFRICA POLICY Please send ORGANIZATIONAL (not individual) sign-ons to: <g7africa@yahoo.com>, and include your location The following letter is initiated by: ActionAid USA; Africa Action; the 50 Years Is Enough Network; and TransAfrica Forum Deadline for sign-ons: Wednesday, June 12 - 5 pm U.S. Eastern time
Statement to the G7 Finance Ministers, We, the undersigned groups, call upon you, the Finance Ministers of the G7 countries, to use the occasion of your meeting on June 14-15 to commit to an agenda that will address Africa's most critical economic challenges. We welcome the proposed focus on Africa at this year's G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada, and we urge you to ensure that action is taken that will make a real difference in reducing poverty and promoting development. It is critical that this meeting create a new framework for partnership between the G7 and African countries, based on a firm commitment to dismantling the barriers to Africa's economic development and addressing the continent's most urgent priorities. The official African initiative, entitled the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), is likely to frame much of the discussion at the G7 meetings. This is a significant new plan defined by a group of African leaders that seeks to address the continent's development challenges. However, NEPAD is still an emerging initiative that requires broader consultation among African leaders and civil society. In recent weeks, many of the most-respected African civil society organizations and coalitions [e.g. the Council for Development and Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), Third World Network-Africa, and the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD Group, as well as many prominent African development experts, have publicly deplored the extremely limited consultations -- which excluded many African governments entirely, as well as the continent's civil society -- involved in drafting NEPAD. In its current state, NEPAD reflects the prevailing economic perspectives of donor countries rather than those defined by Africans themselves. It cannot become the cornerstone for a new partnership between African governments and G7 governments until it has first become a partnership between African governments and their own people. Unless this initiative is more fully informed by African voices, it cannot be regarded as a blueprint for Africa's development. The focus of the upcoming G7 meetings, therefore, should be on the particular role and responsibilities of the G7 countries themselves. The agenda must address the actions required of G7 governments to remove the impediments to poverty reduction in Africa. The G7 Action Plan for Africa, drafted in secret by officials of G7 countries and designed to complement NEPAD, does not address Africa's most immediate priorities. The Plan utterly fails to focus on the concrete actions already available to G7 governments that would have a real and positive impact. Specifically, the G7 governments have the power to cancel Africa's oppressive burden of illegitimate foreign debt; the resources to increase investments in human development and especially to fully finance the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; and the influence to redress the structural imbalance in trade relations between rich and poor countries. This should be the Africa agenda in Halifax and Kananaskis. Africa's burden of foreign debt, much of it arguably illegitimate or "odious," represents the single largest obstacle to the continent's development. So long as African countries are forced to spend almost $15 billion per year repaying debts to G7 countries and the international financial institutions, they will be unable to address their urgent domestic needs. The constant outward flow of desperately needed resources undermines poverty reduction initiatives and cripples efforts to cope with the devastating impact of the HIV/AIDS crisis. The current international debt relief framework, the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, has failed to resolve Africa's debt crisis. Even by its own measure, this framework is not reducing debt to levels described by the World Bank as "sustainable". The HIPC plan is a flawed approach to addressing Africa's debt crisis. It offers insufficient relief to a limited number of countries, it ties debt relief to specific austerity measures, and it serves chiefly the interests of creditors. It fails also to address the question of illegitimacy hovering over so much of this debt. "Enhancements" of HIPC at this time of gathering crises could only be seen as a shell game. A serious commitment to addressing Africa's challenges must begin by releasing the continent from debt bondage. There is an urgent need for a greater commitment of resources from the G7 countries to support African efforts to address the continent's health crisis and related social and economic challenges. Increased public investment of this kind should be seen as an obligation of G7 countries. The enormous wealth of the world's richest countries is directly related to the impoverishment of Africa and the global South more broadly. The growing disparity between the poor and the wealthy in the world is both unconscionable and destabilizing. More money is essential to address the impact of the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa and to stem the spread of the pandemic worldwide. The Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is an important new mechanism to finance the war on AIDS. Currently, its effectiveness is being undermined by a lack of funding from rich country governments. Whereas the Global Fund requires $10 billion a year if it is to succeed in financing both prevention and treatment, especially the provision of essential medicines, less than $2 billion has been pledged so far. The war on AIDS can be won. But only if the G7 commits far greater resources than it has to date. Just as the committed funding for combating HIV/AIDS is far short of what is needed, so too are resources, including fresh research in the service of the public interest rather than private profit, dedicated to fighting health challenges with a longer history in Africa. Diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria remain major killers in Africa, despite the fact that we already know how to control them; what we lack is the political will and the resources to get effective treatment to Africans. More broadly, the G7 should invest in promoting health and education for Africa's people as a foundation for sustainable growth. It is widely recognized that such investments in human development are indispensable to poverty reduction. They are also essential if the Millennium Development Goals are to be met. Yet, levels of development assistance from rich countries have fallen in a consistent downward trend in the past decade. Despite repeated commitments from western governments to provide 0.7% of their gross national product (GNP) for official development assistance, not one of the G7 countries reaches half of that figure. The true measurement of the G7's new commitment to Africa will be revealed by the degree to which these figures change as a result of the Kananaskis summit. While debt cancellation and increased public investment by rich countries must form two key pillars of a successful approach to Africa's economic challenges, trade can also play an important role. In order for trade to generate sustainable growth, however, there must be a more equitable trading relationship between rich countries and African countries. Over the past two decades, the vulnerability and marginalization of African countries in the global economy has been exacerbated rather than eased by trade liberalization policies imposed by external powers. Africa's share of world trade has declined to less than half of what it was in 1980, resting now at only 1.5%. African economies remain overdependent on primary commodities, while trade barriers imposed by rich countries severely restrict access for African products to foreign markets. Changing this dynamic will require a commitment on the part of the G7 countries to simplify expanded market access for African goods and to dismantle trade barriers. It will necessitate the establishment of more equitable terms of trade and an end to the current double standards in international trade rules. At present, developing countries face tariff barriers that are four times higher than those encountered by rich countries. These barriers cost poor countries an estimated $100 billion a year. Trade can only be a successful contributor to economic growth in Africa to the extent that the G7 countries take actions to level the playing field in the global economy. Finally, a new partnership between the G7 and African countries must be based on a shift away from the practice of imposing economic policies dictated by G7 governments and the International Financial Institutions. Instead, a true partnership must focus on priorities and strategies defined by African countries themselves to reduce poverty and promote development. Your meeting in Halifax must move beyond rhetoric to immediate actions such as debt cancellation that would make a real difference for Africa's people. >> Please send ORGANIZATIONAL (not individual) sign-ons to: <g7africa@yahoo.com>, and include your location. Thank you!
Signatories
ActionAid USA (co-initiator), Washington, DC USA
NON-G7 / AFRICAN COUNTRIES
Action Pour la Promotion des Initiatives Communautaires (APIC),
Parakou, Benin
G7 COUNTRIES
Africa AIDS Action Committee, Philadelphia, PA USA
Additional Related Links
G8/G7 Information Centre
G8/G7 2001 Summit in Genoa
G8/G7 2000 Summit in Okinawa
G6Billion People's Summit in Calgary
G8 Activism
50 Years is Enough
Action Aid
TransAfrica Forum
Documents previously distributed in the e-journal are
available on the Africa Action website:
To be added to or dropped from the e-journal subscription list,
write to e-journal@africaaction.org. For more information about
reposted material, please contact directly the source mentioned
in the posting.
|
|
Africa Policy E-Journal
